Compare Solutions

Mediar vs Skyvern

Desktop + Web vs browser-only

The Verdict

Skyvern is strong for browser automation (85.8% WebVoyager benchmark). But it's browser-only. Mediar handles both web and desktop - SAP GUI, Oracle, Excel, EHRs. When Playwright and browser tools fail because the application isn't a web app, Mediar's OS-level approach works.

At a Glance

Feature
Mediar
Skyvern
Scope
Desktop & Web
Browser only
Technology
OS-level APIs
LLM + Vision

Beyond the Browser

Skyvern excels at browser automation. But enterprise workflows extend beyond browsers - EHRs, ERPs, legacy Windows apps. These don't have APIs. Browser-based tools can't reach them. Mediar's OS-level technology works with any application.

Pricing & Value

Recommended

Mediar

Usage-based
  • Pay per successful execution
  • 99% automation success rate
  • Implementation in days, not months

Skyvern

Open-source / Cloud pricing

    "Skyvern is self-hostable. Mediar offers turnkey deployment with desktop automation."

    Why move away from Skyvern?

    Cons of Skyvern

    • Browser-only
    • No desktop apps
    • Prompt setup complexity

    Where Skyvern is strong

    • 85.8% WebVoyager benchmark
    • Open-source
    • Handles CAPTCHAs, 2FA

    Ready to switch to modern automation?

    Join the teams moving from Skyvern to Mediar for faster, more reliable workflows.