Compare Solutions

Mediar vs Cyberdesk

Production-ready vs open-source infrastructure

The Verdict

Cyberdesk offers solid open-source infrastructure for virtual desktop orchestration (YC S25). They target similar use cases - EHRs, ERPs - but require more development effort. Mediar provides a turnkey platform with faster time-to-production. Both use OS-level approaches; Cyberdesk is building blocks, Mediar is the complete solution.

At a Glance

Feature
Mediar
Cyberdesk
Approach
Deterministic + Self-healing
Self-learning agent
Deployment
Turnkey in 1 week
DIY integration

Build vs Buy

Cyberdesk gives you infrastructure-level control - great if you have engineering resources. Mediar offers turnkey deployment with built-in self-healing. The choice depends on whether you want to build infrastructure or ship automations.

Pricing & Value

Recommended

Mediar

Usage-based / Turnkey
  • Pay per successful execution
  • 99% automation success rate
  • Implementation in days, not months

Cyberdesk

Open-source + Cloud

    "Cyberdesk's open-source is great for teams with engineering resources. Mediar is faster for teams prioritizing deployment speed."

    Why move away from Cyberdesk?

    Cons of Cyberdesk

    • Requires development effort
    • Newer platform (2025)
    • Agent approach less predictable

    Where Cyberdesk is strong

    • Open-source with YC backing
    • TypeScript and Python SDKs
    • Self-learning agent approach

    Ready to switch to modern automation?

    Join the teams moving from Cyberdesk to Mediar for faster, more reliable workflows.