Compare Solutions

Mediar vs n8n

Desktop automation vs API integration

The Verdict

n8n is excellent for API-based workflows with a great visual builder. But here's the fundamental limitation: web APIs only exist when vendors provide them. n8n cannot automate desktop apps, legacy systems, or anything without an API. Mediar works at the OS level - we interact with applications directly, whether they have APIs or not.

At a Glance

Feature
Mediar
n8n
Scope
Desktop & Web
API only
Legacy Apps
Native support
Not supported

Better Together

n8n and Mediar solve different problems - and many of our customers use both. n8n handles API-based workflows beautifully: connecting SaaS tools, triggering webhooks, orchestrating data flows. Mediar handles what APIs can't reach: SAP GUI, Oracle Forms, legacy EHRs, desktop Excel. Use n8n for your API layer, Mediar for your desktop layer. Best of both worlds.

Pricing & Value

Recommended

Mediar

Usage-based
  • Pay per successful execution
  • 99% automation success rate
  • Implementation in days, not months

n8n

Free self-hosted / $24+/mo cloud

    "n8n is cost-effective for API workflows. Mediar handles what APIs can't reach."

    Why move away from n8n?

    Cons of n8n

    • Cannot automate desktop apps
    • Requires APIs to exist
    • Self-hosting requires DevOps

    Where n8n is strong

    • Excellent visual workflow builder
    • Unlimited workflows on all plans
    • 400+ API integrations
    • Self-hostable

    Ready to switch to modern automation?

    Join the teams moving from n8n to Mediar for faster, more reliable workflows.